|
It was an amazing day.
There was nothing to stop the
100 odd reformasi crowd from gathering outside the magistrate
court on Aug 4.
There was nothing to stop people
from seeking solidarity with opposition leaders who face trial
for illegal assemblies.
There was nothing to stop the
chanting of "Suara Rakyat", "Re-for-ma-si",
"Hancur Mahathir" and "Tangkap Mahathir"
There was nothing to stop the
distribution of leafets carrying information on Anwar's sodomy
trial.
There was nothing to stop people
from holding a press release issued by Suhakam's Chief Musa Hitam
in support of rights to peaceful assembly - just in case they
were arrested.
Nor was there anything to stop
a solitary figure carrying a poster of Anwar Ibrahim and adressing
of crowd by outside the court house by Keadilan's leaders Tian
Chua and Mohamad Ezam just after their mention in court.
There was nothing to stop the
expression of the nation on this wonderful day - not the rain,
not the countless threats by government officials asking people
not to join the gathering, not the intimidating presence of FRU
police personnels with their shields and batons, water canons,
fire engines and red cross vans, not even the warning signs
on TV airing excerpts of the May 13 '69 riots on Aug 1.
There was a real sense of unity
of the masses as people of different gender, race, religion,
social background and age waited outside the court house.
The Bar Council observers were
there. The NGO observers were there and the journalists were
there. But where was Suhakam (Human Rights Commision) observers,
most people asked?
The coming together of
people on Aug 4 said more about "national unity" than
all the programs and activities ever organised by the country's
National Unity Department.
Because the coming together of
people on Aug 4 was about justice, truth and human rights. This
is what unity is all about, not holding hands on TV singing "malaysia
tercinta", not visiting people's house's during hari raya,
christmas or chinese new year and certainly not about walkathons
and bridge runs".
Other than wanting to show support
for Anwar Ibrahim and other opposition leaders, many were there
to see for themselves who would actually initiate the violence
that the prime minister and his home ministry constantly accuse
are the demonstrators themselves.
After the Aug 4 rally, observers
have seen for themselves that it is the police who had started
the commotion when they moved in with their shields, crash helmets
and batons to disperse the crowd.
Why was there need to disperse
the crowd? There was no conjestion of traffic accept for the
normal traffic jam.
There was no untoward incidence
happening accept for chanting of slogans and distribution of
leaflets.
Yet there were people who were
pushed, kicked, warned and arrested as in the case of Mona Shofian,
Gobalakrishnan, Lokman Nor Adam and 4 others.
Why can't the authorities accept
the fact that in any nation, pluralism does not only exists in
names, color of skin, gods or deities one worships but pluralism
also exists in terms of ideology, principals and support of different
political parties?
Why can't the government accept
the fact that no matter what they do, no matter what they plan,
no matter how powerful they think they are in crippling the forces
of the nation, there will always be people brave enough, human
beings who still hold on to principals of justice, truth and
good governance that would rise among the crowd and speak their
hearts and minds.
Political detainees under the
ISA and Anwar Ibrahim are such people. The government can imprison
their bodies, cripple their movements and break their spirits,
but nothing can bind their consciousness, nothing can take away
their dignity and nothing can stop others from walking the very
same pathway.
Susan.
|