|
FAC News -
Friday, June 21, 2002 8:19 AM
SUHAKAM
INQUIRY ON THE ISA: ISA detainees demand Friday prayers
The Human Rights
Commission of Malaysia’s (Suhakam) public inquiry was told that,
in the past, Internal Security Act (ISA) detainees in the Kamunting
Detention Center
were allowed to perform their obligatory Friday congregational prayers
but, now, this is no longer allowed.
Suhakam, which
sat on 18 and 19 June 2002, conducted the public inquiry to hear complaints
from the detainees as to how they are being treated and the conditions
of their detention.
It is the duty
of every Muslim male to perform their congregational Friday prayers
and one is not allowed to skip it for more than three consecutive
weeks explained one detainee. He, however, has missed his Friday
prayers for 50 consecutive weeks, and this is certainly not allowed
in Islam.
The detainees
could not understand why their annual Hari Raya (Eid) prayers, which
are optional, are allowed, whereas the compulsory weekly Friday
prayers are not. How can the optional Hari Raya prayers, which are
not compulsory, be permitted, while the detainees are barred from
performing their compulsory Friday prayers?
Even in the
US,
prisoners are allowed to perform their Friday prayers, argued the
detainees. Malaysian Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohammad has said
that Malaysia
is a fundamentalist Islamic nation, quipped the detainee. If so,
then how come they are not free to fulfill their religious obligations?
The detainees
also said that their family’s financial needs are not being looked
into while they are under detention. Many of the detainees’ wives
do not work and, since they had been detained, their families have
found it difficult to make ends meets.
Other detainees
related that their wives had been sacked from their jobs because
their husbands had been detained and they are now unemployed. Other
wives had been evicted from their houses because their landlords
do not want ISA detainees as their tenants.
The detainees
felt it is the duty of the government to support their families
since it is the government that has detained them thereby causing
them this hardship.
Suhakam had
no replies to these questions other than it would raise this matter
with the authorities.
|