|
FAC News -
Friday, June 21, 2002 8:18 AM
SUHAKAM
INQUIRY ON THE ISA: We are scared of telling the truth, say ISA
detainees
The Human Rights
Commission of Malaysia’s (Suhakam) public inquiry, which was held
over two days on 18 and 19 June 2002, was told that the Internal Security Act (ISA)
detainees are fearful of telling the whole story.
The inquiry
was called to investigate the treatment the ISA detainees were receiving
plus the conditions at the Kamunting Detention Centre as demanded
by the Kamunting 6 – National Justice Party Youth Leader Ezam Mohd
Nor, Saari Sungib, Dr Badrulamin Bahron, Tian Chua, Lokman Noor
Adam and Hishamuddin Rais.
One detainee,
who was bolder in his revelation and did not care if he was detained
for ten years for being so, said that what the detainees have been
telling the inquiry so far are but just some of the stories. Many
more remain untold as the detainees are scared of reprisal from
the authorities if they reveal all.
According to
the detainees, they had been threatened with longer detentions if
they “complain”, so many prefer to say nice things to ensure an
early release.
In fact, almost
all the detainees who testified on the first day said they were
being well treated and had no complaints. One even said detention
in the Kamunting Detention Centre was “like heaven” compared to
the initial 60 days detention period.
Another detainee
said he would only reveal the truth if he could speak privately
to Suhakam without the presence of the Special Branch officers and
the prison authorities. (The Special Branch officers and camp guards
outnumbered the members of the media during the two-day inquiry).
Others said
that the Special Branch had threatened to arrest their wives and
children if they did not “cooperate”. In fact, the wife of one detainee
was arrested two months ago but was released after her lawyers filed
a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
She was released
just before her Habeas Corpus application was due to be heard by
the court raising suspicion that her arrest was merely aimed at
frightening her husband into cooperating and that she had not actually
committed any crime.
This “example”
has frightened the other detainees into silence and they prefer
not to “rock the boat”. Also, the fact that some ISA detainees have
been under detention for almost two years now and are hoping that
they would be released soon makes it even more disadvantageous for
them to squeal lest their detention gets extended another two years,
as ISA detentions have no fixed time limit and can be extended indefinitely.
|