|

FAC
News - Monday, February 10, 2003 7:30 AM
|
|
INTER-PARLIAMENTARY UNION
chemin du pommier 5
1218 LE GRAND-SACONNEX / GENEVA (switzerland)
telephone
(41.22)
919 41 50 - fax
(41.22) 919 41 60 - e-mail
postbox@mail.ipu.org
|
COMMITTEE
ON THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF PARLIAMENTARIANS
CASE N° MAL/15 - ANWAR IBRAHIM - MALAYSIA
Decision adopted
by the Committee at its 100th session
(Geneva, 20 - 23 January
2003)
The
Committee,
Referring to the outline of the case of Mr.
Anwar Ibrahim of Malaysia,
and to the resolution adopted by the Council of the Inter-Parliamentary
Union at its 171st session (September 2002),
Taking account of a communication from the National
Human Rights Commission (SUHAKAM) dated 13
January 2003,
Recalling that, having been dismissed from his
post as Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister, Mr. Anwar Ibrahim
was arrested and prosecuted on charges of corruption and sodomy;
he was found guilty on both counts and sentenced, in April 1999
and August 2000, respectively, to a total of term 15 years' imprisonment
which he is currently serving; while no date has as yet been set
to hear Mr. Anwar Ibrahim’s appeal in the sodomy case, the Federal
Court on 10 July 2002 dismissed in the last instance Mr. Anwar Ibrahim's
appeal against the corruption charges,
Recalling its earlier concerns as set out in
the resolution which the IPU Council adopted on this case in September 2002 regarding
respect for the right to fair trial, in particular the right to
defence; referring in particular to the observations which the Chief
Justices made in their judgment in the Zainur
Zakaria case in which they emphasized the “sacrosanctity” of the right of defendants to answer the charges
and to prepare their “defence fully, fairly and effectively … a
principle so fundamental to our system of justice”,
Recalling that Mr. Anwar Ibrahim has been hospitalised
in Kuala Lumpur General Hospital since 24 November 2000 and that
his surgeon concluded that he required urgent spinal surgery which,
in his view, could only be performed satisfactorily abroad; however,
Mr. Anwar Ibrahim was not allowed to go abroad for such treatment;
on 31 May 2001, the National Human Rights Commission (SUHAKAM),
stated publicly that he should be allowed to undergo medical treatment
abroad; noting that the 1995 Prison Act allowed the prison authorities
to release a prisoner on licence and that nothing prevented Mr.
Anwar Ibrahim from being sent abroad for medical treatment; considering
that, in its communication of 13 January 2003, SUHAKAM stated that
its stand remained unchanged; however, it had advisory powers only
and could not to compel the authorities to accept recommendations,
Recalling that it has repeatedly requested the
parliamentary authorities to provide information on how the Malaysian
Parliament, as a guardian of human rights, ensures follow-up to
the recommendations made by SUHAKAM and that, in their observations
forwarded in August 2002, they undertook to provide these details,
1. Thanks the National Human Rights Commission
for the observations provided;
2. Regrets the absence of any communication
from the parliamentary authorities, in particular as regards the
follow-up it generally gives to SUHAKAM recommendations;
3. Can only reaffirm its opinion, in
the absence of any new elements, that the court of first instance
in the “corruption case”, in disallowing evidence attesting that
the prosecution had attempted to fabricate evidence against Mr.
Anwar Ibrahim, has not given him a genuine opportunity to clear
himself of the charges; considers that the emphasis put by the Federal
Court on the right to defence lends considerable weight to its opinion;
4. Continues therefore to believe that
Mr. Anwar Ibrahim’s prosecution and sentencing may well, in both
cases, have been politically motivated;
5. Reaffirms that recommendations of a
National Human Rights Commission carry special weight and should
not be dismissed by the competent authorities; calls therefore once
again on the authorities, in particular the Malaysian Parliament
as a guardian of human rights, to give full support to the clear
recommendations of the National Human Rights Commission so as to
obtain permission for Mr. Anwar Ibrahim to follow his personal choice
of medical treatment abroad;
6. Requests the Secretary General to convey
this decision to the Malaysian authorities and to the sources;
7. Decides to continue examining this
case at its next session (April 2003).
|