|
BLAST
FROM THE PAST
The Sport of Mahathir Mohamed (Political Moves Mgainst Anwar Ibrahim)
Author/s: Ziauddin Sardar
Issue: Sept 11, 1998
Ziauddin Sardar on the
unevenly matched power struggle in Malaysia between an opinionated bigot and a moderate free-market intellectual
The Commonwealth Games, which started this week in Kuala Lumpur, hold little interest for most Malaysians. Even though the organisers are virtually giving away the tickets, they cannot
fill the National Stadium. Domestic attention is
focused on a deadlier game - the political assassination
of Anwar Ibrahim.
Anwar, a personal friend of mine, is undoubtedly
Malaysia's most popular politician. He was widely seen as a natural successor
to Mahathir Mohamed, Malaysia's prime minister for more than 17 years. He held the portfolios
of finance and deputy prime minister. Last week, Mahathir removed
Anwar from both positions. He also had Anwar expelled from Umno
(United Malays National Organisation), the ruling party. Simultaneously,
he ordered the police to investigate Anwar for a host of alleged
obscenity charges. Now Mahathir is threatening to arrest Anwar under
the Internal Security Act (ISA), a legacy of British colonialism,
and imprison him indefinitely without trial.
Although Mahathir's moves against Anwar were sudden and dramatic,
he had planned the allegations against him for almost a year. Even though it was Mahathir who nursed him up the political ladder,
Anwar had become a threat. His was the only voice of dissent. Mahathir
saw each disagreement, every objection to his economic policies,
as an act of rebellion to thwart his ambition to continue as prime
minister well into the next century.
The two leaders could not be more different, as is clear from their
respective books: Mahathir's The Malay Dilemma (1970), and The Asian
Renaissance (1996) by Anwar. Mahathir is an authoritarian who insists
on total conformity. Anwar is a democrat who believes in civil society,
a free press and "transparent government". While Anwar
stands for a free market, Mahathir wants the market to be under
his command.
Mahathir hates the west, demonises it,
but wants all the west can offer. Anwar argues that in a globalised
world, the west and the non-west can no longer
be separated. Mahathir has used the Asian values debate to
justify his position; Anwar has exposed the manipulation of the
debate to excuse corruption. In short, Anwar is a moderate intellectual,
Mahathir an opinionated bigot.
It was thus not a question of if but when the
differences between the two men would lead to open warfare.
The early phase of the Asian economic crisis provided a trigger.
While Mahathir blamed the downfall of the tiger economies on George
Soros, "the Jews" and a "western
conspiracy", Anwar saw the seeds of the crisis closer to home.
He pointed towards rampant corruption, the economy of greed and
grab, uncontrolled speculation and Mahathir's obsession with grandiose
mega-projects.
At home, ordinary Malaysians Malays, Chinese or Indian - identified
with Anwar's concern and saw him as a counterpoint to Mahathir's
excesses. Abroad, he was courted by world leaders
and international organisations. He became the president
of Unesco and headed IMF and World Bank committees. He was on the cover of Time
magazine. Mahathir saw all this as a conspiracy against him.
The
prime minister's attempts to bail out a handful of companies, owned
by his family and friends, at the expense of public funds, have
been resisted by Anwar. Matters came to a head last month
when Ahmad Don, the independent-minded governor of the central bank,
resigned. Anwar backed Don and agreed with his objection to the
use of trusts and pension funds to save companies that had performed
poorly. Mahathir reacted by announcing foreign-exchange controls
and pegging the Malaysian ringgit to the
dollar. The move sent shockwaves through the market.
Over
the past decade poison-pen letters have
become an integral part of Malaysian politics. Mahathir's campaign
against Anwar started with an anonymous letter, circulated to politicians
last year, which claimed Anwar was having an affair with the wife
of his private secretary. No one believed the accusation and Anwar
ignored it.
Then,
earlier this year, Kuala Lumpur was stunned with
the publication of a book entitled Fifty Reasons Why Anwar Shouldn't
Be Prime Minister. The book added a host of new allegations, all
designed to discredit Anwar in the eyes of his Muslim constituency.
He is alleged in the book to be a homosexual, philanderer, traitor
and, for good measure, an impotent man who visits prostitutes.
There
is little doubt, says Anwar, that Mahathir is behind the book, which
also tries to link him to a murder. The publisher of the book turns
out to be Tamby Chik, disgraced former chief minister of Malacca, and
one of Mahathir's stalwarts. The book was distributed
through the ruling party with the aid of Sabbaruddin
Chik, the general secretary, who generously provided free copies
to all the delegates at the Umno general
assembly in June. Nothing moves in Umno
without Mahathir's nod. Both the attorney general and the inspector
general of police, Anwar says, have been instructed to accept the allegations in the book
as true.
The
prime minister has replaced the editor-in-chief of Utusan Malayu
and the group editor of Barita Harian,
two large-circulation Malay papers. Also removed was an influential
director of TV3, the semi-independent terrestrial channel. All three
were accused of behaving "no better than the foreign media"
and replaced with hand-picked yes men. The Malaysian media is now having a field
day producing new allegations against Anwar.
One
of the allegations in Fifty Reasons concerns Nallakaruppan,
a businessman and an official of the Malaysian
Indian Congress which represents the Indian community in the national
coalition government. Nalla is purported
to have procured prostitutes for the former deputy prime minister,
and given him [pounds]10 million. When the police raided Nalla's
house they are said to have found 125 rounds
of ammunition and a pistol. He is now being held
under the ISA for possession of ammunition, a charge that carries
an automatic death sentence.
However,
the interrogation of Nalla is
focused not on the ammunition but his supposed relationship
with Anwar, who says that Nalla is only
an acquaintance. Nalla's lawyers have claimed that the police are trying to
force confessions out of him and that the judges are taking orders
from higher authorities.
Last
week a statement issued by 15 human rights organisations, including
Amnesty International, dismissed the "unsubstantiated affidavits,
vague insinuation of treason and nebulous accusations" against
Anwar. The statement demanded that Anwar be given
a right to reply and declared "the total lack of transparency
in this episode" as a "reflection of the utter contempt
and disregard that the prime minister has for the views of the people".
COPYRIGHT
1998 New Statesman, Ltd.
|