8
March 2001
The
arrest of Keadilan Youth Leader Ezam brings forth a rather ridiculous
and ironic scenario. A corrupt regime that has long avoided
being toppled by resorting to suppression of democracy should
now be using a breach of democracy as pretext to arrest an opposition
leader whose avowed platform is to topple the country's leader
through democratic means. Sounds complicated? Not so.
Ezam
has just launched a nationwide campaign of "Movement to Save the
People's Money", after the Nation was stunned and flabbergasted
by a series of multi-billion ringgit government bail out of political
cronies at exorbitant prices without proper basis (latest cases
being Tajuddin Ramli of MAS and Halim Saad for the Light Rail
Transit). As the local mass media is either too muzzled or manipulated
by the ruling party to bare the truth, the Youth Movements of
the Alternative Front have decided to do a weekly road show from
one State to another to alert the Nation to the full impact of
these continued atrocious raids on the people's coffers.
To
counter this campaign, Minguan Malaysia, a newspaper acting undisguised
as the ruling party's propaganda machine and agitator, promptly
pounced upon an occasion to interview Ezam to allege him (on Sunday
4th) of having "admitted to planning to launch wide-scale demonstration
to topple the
Government
chosen by the people".
Acting
in cohort with Minguan Malaysia, the police quickly arrested Ezam
in the next evening (Monday 5th), in spite of Ezam's instant denial
of having made the alleged statement in the same newspaper the
following day, Monday 5th.
In
arresting Ezam, the police have erred gravely on multiple score.
First,
it is not an offence of the law for wanting to topple a government,
if the means of doing so are constitutional. In this respect,
all the component parties of the Alternative Front have vowed
to use only constitutional means to carry out their political
struggles. They have never done anything unconstitutional.
Nor is there any indication that they will resort to any unconstitutional
manouvre.
Second,
giving public speeches and attending public meetings is a constitutional
right of every citizen, be these political in nature or otherwise.
In fact, it is the police that have breached the Constitution
in their present partisan role in repeatedly disallowing Opposition
rallies without proper reasons, while unreservedly allowing all
ruling party rallies, including those with obvious intention to
incite racial animosities.
Third,
it is wrong police procedure to arrest some one without proper
investigations, when the alleged offence is over a statement,
the authenticity of which is under dispute. The correct
procedure is not to arrest the alleged offender, but to interrogate
both parties concerned.
Fourth,
mere utterances of intention to breach a law do not constitute
a breach of the law. It is through actually carrying out
the offensive act that the law is breached. Hence, even if what
Ezam intends to do is illegal (though it is not), the police have
no justification to arrest him for merely expressing a wish.
Police can only warn him from carrying out the act.
Against
this blatant abuse of power by the police, what does the Minister
in charge of police, the Home Affairs Minister Badawi (also Deputy
Prime Minister) has to say?
Badawi
defended the police action by claiming Ezam to be a "threat to
national security" for having made a newspaper statement of "toppling
the Government through demonstrations".
Firstly,
it is shockingly irresponsible and unfair of Badawi to condemn
Ezam over a statement that the latter has publicly denied.
Badawi owes Izam and the Nation an apology unless he can prove
Ezam has lied.
Secondly,
who is a real threat to national security "Ezam who proposes to
expose, through a series of public rallies, massive corruption
and high level abuse of power exemplified in the latest Government
payout of 1,800 million Ringgit to Tajuddin to buy his MAS shares
at more than double the market price without any proper valuation,
OR the police who, upon receiving such police report of high level
abuse of power from Ezam, instead of acting against the culprits,
have arrested Ezam on an untenable offence, using an indefensible
procedure?
Have
the police been reduced to mere henchmen of the ruling party to
torment and persecute the reformers who are committed to save
this Country from the corrupt rulers through constitutional means?
Mahathir
and Badawi often condemn street demonstrations as the cause for
driving investors from Malaysia¡¦s shore. Nothing
is further from the truth. The barren state of new investment
that Malaysia has found itself in today is caused entirely by
Barisan Nasional's misrule. The Prime Minister himself has
powerfully projected to the world that Malaysia is totally unrepentant
from the ravages of the recent
Financial
Crisis. Instead of recognizing our own structural weaknesses
and instituting remedial political and economic reforms, Mahathir
has indulged in an orgy of anti-West vendetta.
The
worst was yet to come in the merciless and unjust persecution
of Anwar Ibrahim, when Malaysia's last pretenses as a democracy
were destroyed. None of our democratic institutions is spared
of subversion by the Executive, and the world now recognizes Malaysia
as a land without the rule of law of law, where police and the
judiciary are instruments to persecute political reformers, and
where increasing corruption and abuse of power are blatantly and
unashamedly committed with impunity.
Against
this backdrop, occasional street demonstrations by peaceful reformers
only illuminate, not darken, the Malaysian scene, signaling to
the world that hopes of democratic reforms in this Country are
still alive. And dedicated and selfless reform leaders exemplified
by Ezam should be honoured for
their
courage and sacrifice, not imprisoned and punished as "threat
to national security" as alleged by Badawi.
People
who love this Country are entitled to ask: why shouldn't we have
the right to get rid of this corrupt leadership, and as soon as
possible? Why can't we campaign peacefully in the only means
available to us which is public rallies, since the mass media
is blocked, parliament is blocked, police and the judiciary are
against us? Does Barisan Nasional expect us to keep silent
and do nothing while it plunders the Nation¡¦s wealth
and leads the Nation down the drain, helpless and hopeless in
a world fast transforming by globalisation and IT breakthroughs?
With so much damage done, and with so much time lost in steering
this Country to the right course to meet the current challenges,
not a day is to be lost in changing our leadership.
Some
reformers have set a target to oust Mahathir this year. And Mahthir
calls his critics traitors who are out to destabalise the Country
and to topple the "democratically elected" Government before its
term ends and for this "breach of democracy" they deserve to be
punished. In doing so, Mahathire has equated himself with
Malaysia.
What's
wrong with asking a prime minister to quit if he happens to be
a liability to the country? What is so unconstitutional
about building up enough public opinion through peaceful means
to the point that the prime minister feels obliged to step down?
If campaigning for a discredited leader to step down is a crime,
then the politicians in Japan presently asking the unpopular Japanese
Prime Minister Mori to step down should all be prosecuted. Similarly,
current Philippine President Aroyo and her colleagues should also
have been charged for treason for asking former President Estrada
to resign. Ditto present
Indonesian
political leaders asking for President Wahid's resignation. And
ditto the people of Peru who have just ousted their "democratically
elected" President.
Two
decades of autocratic rule has blinded Mahthir to the distinction
between himself and the Country, and criticism of his misdeeds
is construed as act of treason against the Country. When
a leader has reached this state of the mind, it is the clearest
signal that the man is unfit to rule and must leave at once before
further damage is done.
In
a corrupt autocracy like Malaysia, public rallies offer the last
hope of change. Unless the people give their strong backing
to these peaceful and constitutional means of political support
to reforms, the days of a brighter Malaysia will continue to elude
us. It is hoped that the people will see through the Government's
false propaganda which paint the reformasi gatherings as disruptors
to peace and economic development, and roundly condemn the unjust
and illegal persecution of reformers such as the recent arrest
of Ezam and others. Let these new arrests be an impetus
to lift the reformasi movement to a new level.
Kim
Quek
|